So I’ve been wanting to write a mystery story. I’ve been jotting down random notes here and there, and drawn up an outline, and am just about ready to start writing. If you’d rather read the story before you read about how I came up with it, then skip this post: it contains so many spoilers, so many! It even contains spoilers of other future stories. (When I finish the story, I’ll post a link to it here.) But if you’re interested in following along as I cook up the tale, enjoy!
Ashleigh Isaacs
We’ve been enjoying a lot of Holmes, Poirot, Monk, and Leaphorn recently. I have in mind to do a mystery set in late 19th century Boston, at MIT, with a steampunk feel. I’ve also been wanting to do another story with Ashley Isaacs, the crazed inventor from The Time Machine and the Prince of Mars. Now Ashley isn’t steampunk, of course; but I’m the author, and if I want to write a “sequel” that takes place in the past with a sort of alternate-history version of my hero, who’s going to stop me?
So! The heroine is inventor Ashleigh Isaacs, a student at MIT in about 1890. MIT does admit women at this time, unlike most colleges in the world; but Isaacs still suffers under general social expectations about how women should dress and be treated, and the sorts of vocations that are proper for them. For example, Ashleigh can’t really do anything except teach with her degree. There will be some mention of this in the story, but I’m aiming for a lighthearted mystery, so it’ll be backgrounded.
I think she’s a scattered, inattentive teacher. Some inventions of hers that I particularly want to include, in some story or other: (1) the aether-stretcher (more on that eventually), (2) a gender-switching device (though this should wait a bit — I don’t want to echo ‘All Men of Genius‘ too much!).
Ashleigh has a sidekick / boyfriend, Franklin, a Mohawk who has been accepted as a philosopher / mathematics student. (His real name isn’t Franklin, of course, but he’s called that because of his interest in writing and printing.) He is an excellent viewpoint character, since modern readers are probably just as familiar (if not more so) with Native American life as with life at MIT in the 1890′s.
The Story’s Structure and Theme
The keys to an awesome mystery story are (1) tons of red herrings and (2) a conclusion that is satisfying. A satisfying ending means that, once you read it, you realize that no other answer was remotely possible. One also wants to give the reader enough information to figure it out, of course; and this may be the trickiest bit for this case, since it’s a sci-fi story.
For Ashleigh’s stories, I also want to include elements of the fantastic or grotesque, so that they echo more Holmes and less Poirot / Monk. Maybe even add some Lovecraft influence?…
But one can’t follow Doyle too closely. One problem that Holmes’s critics note is that he’s is basically a bundle of eccentricities and little else. Now, this is part of his charm; if Holmes experienced deep self-doubt or inner conflict, he wouldn’t be Holmes. Watson, for his part, isn’t a compelling character either. There’s nothing to prevent deep character development for a detective, but one can’t sustain dozens of stories if the detective gets deeply personally involved in each one. Perhaps I should shoot for shallower, adventureish short stories, and reserve deeper development for novels.
Ok, that’s probably enough to start with. What’s the basic plot of our first short story?
Brainstorming Plot
Idea for how the story starts: detailed description of the lab where Ashleigh works, in the early hours of the morning. Note in passing (early on) that there is a dead body. Dawn comes, and then Ashleigh, who has been asleep at her lab table, wakes up and finds the body. She has no idea who it is…
Other ideas for Ashleigh’s inventions:
- Universal cleaning agent (but how does it know what’s ‘cleaning’ and what’s destroying part of the object itself? Is it actually psychic?)
- Mental powers? Eh.
- Something that reverses / decreases entropy in a localized area. Would be somewhat like going back in time. Could be connected to the aether-stretcher. Uses no power, because it increases entropy in another area. (This would be a universal cleaning agent, actually, as long as you don’t care about making another area very very messy.) …
I like this last idea a lot. Might be some kind of healing agent as well?… It would be (mildly) funny if Ashleigh created this because she got sick of having to clean her lab or take a shower or something. … Suppose the man was killed because he caught the increase of entropy when Ashleigh’s device suddenly worked in the middle of the night. Perhaps he was a young man, even a boy, standing outside selling newspapers (would the date on the newspapers change?), and got hit. He ages incredibly quickly, stumbles into the lab and dies of old age. Maybe his body even decomposes somewhat. His clothes no longer fit properly, but they’re just as ‘old’ as he is. …
Developing the Idea
Cute! Now to make it work at all, I should make it relatively clear how things work to the reader. And I definitely need red herrings everywhere. Maybe an old lady comes in and claims it’s her husband (for some reason — is he thought to be rich?). If the dates on the newspapers change, we have the additional question of why he’s carrying around newspapers from so long ago; and are they valuable antiques? Anything else that gets valuable as it ages — rings, jewelry? Wine! He’s carrying a French wine from like 60 years ago, so he MUST be wealthy — or a thief? …
How will the reader figure it out? How about Ashleigh? What is Ash’s style of deduction? … I think it’d be most exciting if Ashleigh’s style is to *work with the medium*: she’s not into abstract theorizing, she gets out there and tries things. Which leads to a lot of adventure. The reader should be able to (theoretically) figure it out from the armchair, but she won’t: she’s an experimentalist. … I like the idea of the newspaper (and wine bottle label) increasing in entropy, but this doesn’t mean they’d just be ‘older’ (necessarily? depending on how it works?), they might get their letters jumbled too. … But I tend to like the ‘time travel’ type of aging better. Basically it’ll work like Willy Wonka’s Vita-Wonk: this person / wine / newspaper now comes from an “alternate” past in which they actually existed and lived all that time. This works better to dovetail with how time travel works — they’ve been extended ‘sideways’ as well as backwards in time. No one’s memories have been changed, have they? Hmm… I need to think about this.
If someone went back in time and changed something, the changes propogate forward at one second per second, and never catch up to the ever-moving ‘present’. This means that changes propogate at one second per second, regardless of source, and probably of direction. That means that when the boy is made into a corpse, the changes start propogating *backwards* at one second per second. Now, how exactly does the change propogate? Via some kind of ‘reverse’ causality? Suppose a newspaper announcing the boy’s birth is in his pocket. When does it change? Right then? Or not until, say, 10 years pass (assuming the boy is 10)? What makes more sense? What makes a better story?…
Increasing the Jeopardy
What is Ashleigh’s problem? So an old man died in her lab — what’s the big deal? — Well, what is he doing in the lab? Obviously he arrived as a boy; and perhaps Ashleigh was the last one to see the boy alive. Did she give him a gift of some kind? A gift that the dead old man now has?… Anyway, yes, there are two aspects of the mystery: where is the boy (and Ashleigh is a suspect here — what is her motive thought to be? Children are sometimes kidnapped for ransom; or maybe it’s — yes — Franklin is suspected, basically because he’s an Indian and they think he’s going to eat the child or use him in a ritual or something. … In fact, why not go ahead and have Ashleigh be suspected of witchcraft? — Not by the professors at the college, but by the police or passersby. So both of them are sort of vaguely suspected, arrested, questioned.
The primary clue should be when Ashleigh happens to use the entropic device to do something else, and she sees that there’s a side effect of entropy increasing elsewhere. She set it up with the front facing her lab, and the back facing out the window behind her, and it caught the boy squarely (as he was peering in the window at her). Ashleigh was so sleepy she basically fell asleep at once, and the old man staggered in, trying to get help, but died as he came in the door.
Red herring: the reader is 90% sure Ashleigh and Frank didn’t do it, but they don’t have alibis (they were alone in the lab when it happened — Frank had already fallen asleep). But there is a fellow who hates them (not sure who — a professor?) who is trying to frame them — he suggests them as culprits immediately. He’s basically a misogynist who hates Indians.
Ash and Frank suspect him of setting the whole thing up to frame them. Perhaps he works with dead bodies; he could have kidnapped the boy and used the boy’s clothes on a corpse, simultaneously framing Ash and Frank for kidnapping and murder. So they’ll will spend part of the time seeing if they can dig up clues on him.
Something should happen partway through that make them afraid that they’ll be kidnapped or murdered. Will the professor strike again? …Or perhaps the misogynist professor will disappear, too, and a dead old man will be found at the scene… Again, in Ashleigh’s lab. Or maybe the misogynist slips into her lab trying to plant evidence, and leaves with her lab-cleaning device and a few other inventions. Later he disappears and a dead old man is found in his lab. This is a massive hint, of course, so Ashleigh will be very very close to figuring it out at this point, reverse the device and bring him back to life.
But that’s the problem — the whole point of this is to make Ash and Frank afraid they’ll be targeted next. But they’re already in jeopardy because of the planted evidence and so forth, so that’s ok. Maybe they’re picked up by the police, told about the new evidence (planted), and told that the misogynist is missing and a corpse found in his lab.
At what point should the readers be told *how* the lab-cleaning device works? Something as simple as “it reverses entropy” might totally give away what happened. Ashleigh should use 19th-century terminology, which would confuse the reader — something like ‘conversion towards Platonic forms’.
Resolution: Ashleigh should use the device to re-messy her lab, while bringing the old man back to boyhood.
The device works by finding a ‘timeline’ in which the area or item in question is in its highest-ordered state and moving it towards that state. (Not all the way there — highest-ordered states (high complexity) are not ‘neat’, and lowest-ordered states are just gases or something.)
Ok, I think I have all the necessary elements. Time to write an outline.
The Outline
Remember: viewpoint character is Franklin.
- Ashleigh’s lab. detailed description of the lab where Ashleigh works, in the early hours of the morning. It is immaculately clean. Note in passing (early on) that there is a dead body. Dawn comes, and then Ashleigh, who has been asleep at her lab table, wakes up and finds the body. She has no idea who it is…
- Ashleigh screams and wakens Franklin, who runs downstairs. Discussion: who is this man? Details of his dress & c. He’s carrying a bottle of wine from 60 years ago. Note he’s wearing the same type of clothes of the paper boy from the early hours, though they are older and fit him fine. But he’s been dead a while; why would anyone drag a corpse in here? Some kind of sick joke? The boy’s stash of papers is outside, but the boy is missing — can’t have been more than a few hours. Ashleigh remembers seeing the clock before she fell asleep. She finds clock. Franklin then realizes the lab is gorgeous, comments that she got her machine to work. The two get lost in a discussion of the minutia, then remember the dead body and missing boy and call the police.
- Police interviewing Ash and Franklin. They are clearly suspected, especially since Ash was the last to see the paperboy that morning (she bought a paper and bumped into Dr Mordeaux, who is the witness). Mordeaux suggests they might have wanted the corpse for medical experiments.
- Ash & Frank, after class, buy an evening edition and see that they’re suspected of all sorts of nasty things. They, meanwhile, concoct a theory that it’s all Dr. Mordeaux, a doctor who’s hated them forever. Frank maybe quotes Doyle: when a doctor goes wrong, he’s the first of criminals.
- Ash & Frank sneak into Mordeaux’s lab (even as he is sneaking into theirs). They find all sorts of nasty things he was doing, but unfortunately it includes an alibi for him (ie evidence that he was there from when he bought the paper until well after the murder — eg paper all laid out, read through, coffee cup stains all over it. At end of scene they’re very caught breaking and entering; and the police say they have new evidence — they’re being arrested — the police found a note asking the old man to meet A&F there at the lab. Then — horrors! As they’re being led away, there’s a scream from Mordeaux’s lab. They rush back and find that Mordeaux is missing, too, and a long-dead corpse wearing his clothes was found… (maybe, to make it harder, the clothes are pretty much rotted away?) …and in the room with him are other items from A&F’s lab. It appears he WAS trying to frame them. Ashleigh figures things out, and brings Mordeaux back to life.
Next: the actual writing!
![Part of the cowling for one of the motors for a B-25 bomber is assembled in the engine department of North American [Aviation, Inc.]'s Inglewood, Calif., plant (LOC)](http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2288/2179073047_4265effdc3.jpg)



Get SW by Email
Mere America
