<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Worship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://druidjournal.net/word-of-the-day/2007/06/20/worship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://druidjournal.net/word-of-the-day/2007/06/20/worship/</link>
	<description>At the Crossroads of Sound and Meaning</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 08:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Druid Journal Word of the Day &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Muhammad</title>
		<link>http://druidjournal.net/word-of-the-day/2007/06/20/worship/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>Druid Journal Word of the Day &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Muhammad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 16:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://druidjournal.net/word-of-the-day/2007/06/20/worship/#comment-129</guid>
		<description>[...] means &#8220;the Praiseworthy&#8221; &#8212; similar to the original meaning of the English word worship [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] means &#8220;the Praiseworthy&#8221; &#8212; similar to the original meaning of the English word worship [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Lilly</title>
		<link>http://druidjournal.net/word-of-the-day/2007/06/20/worship/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Lilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://druidjournal.net/word-of-the-day/2007/06/20/worship/#comment-80</guid>
		<description>Hey, no worries, Ali.  I hope you had a great birthday!

It's very curious how the meaning of the word has changed.  I think many many people today would agree with your friend -- I certainly would have, a couple of years ago, when I was Zen and the idea of worship was completely foreign to me.  And yet the standard dictionary definitions say nothing about grovelling or submission -- only reverence, honor, and love.  I wonder if the word can still be salvaged?...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, no worries, Ali.  I hope you had a great birthday!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s very curious how the meaning of the word has changed.  I think many many people today would agree with your friend &#8212; I certainly would have, a couple of years ago, when I was Zen and the idea of worship was completely foreign to me.  And yet the standard dictionary definitions say nothing about grovelling or submission &#8212; only reverence, honor, and love.  I wonder if the word can still be salvaged?&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali</title>
		<link>http://druidjournal.net/word-of-the-day/2007/06/20/worship/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://druidjournal.net/word-of-the-day/2007/06/20/worship/#comment-79</guid>
		<description>Thanks for taking a look at this word, Jeff (and sorry I'm so late in commenting!). I was curious about its etymology and phonosemantics because of a conversation with my best friend recently. He's dead-set against the idea of "worship," associating it with formal ritual within a structured religion and thinking of it as a kind of groveling or submission. On the other hand, I would be hard pressed to find a better word to describe a lot of what my spiritual practice is about, because I see worship as a kind of celebration and praise of one's relationship with Spirit. It's interesting that worship has (what now seems so obvious) a connection to the idea of "worth" and honor. I like the idea that the willed choice to acknowledge the "worth" of Spirit, rather than emphasizing the separation of self from that Spirit, actually becomes a process of breaking down the barriers between the two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for taking a look at this word, Jeff (and sorry I&#8217;m so late in commenting!). I was curious about its etymology and phonosemantics because of a conversation with my best friend recently. He&#8217;s dead-set against the idea of &#8220;worship,&#8221; associating it with formal ritual within a structured religion and thinking of it as a kind of groveling or submission. On the other hand, I would be hard pressed to find a better word to describe a lot of what my spiritual practice is about, because I see worship as a kind of celebration and praise of one&#8217;s relationship with Spirit. It&#8217;s interesting that worship has (what now seems so obvious) a connection to the idea of &#8220;worth&#8221; and honor. I like the idea that the willed choice to acknowledge the &#8220;worth&#8221; of Spirit, rather than emphasizing the separation of self from that Spirit, actually becomes a process of breaking down the barriers between the two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Lilly</title>
		<link>http://druidjournal.net/word-of-the-day/2007/06/20/worship/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Lilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 16:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://druidjournal.net/word-of-the-day/2007/06/20/worship/#comment-64</guid>
		<description>A further note here:  my wife notes that she pronounces "worship" and "warship" almost identically -- with the same vowel in the first syllable, but with slightly more stress on the second syllable, since "warship" is a compound.  The phonosemantics of "war" are approprate to the meaning -- a strong, grounded will generating huge energy, with no specified directed result (compare "work", where the will-induced energy is directed into a container "k").

As for "ship", the history and phonosemantics are complex enough to deserve its own entry...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A further note here:  my wife notes that she pronounces &#8220;worship&#8221; and &#8220;warship&#8221; almost identically &#8212; with the same vowel in the first syllable, but with slightly more stress on the second syllable, since &#8220;warship&#8221; is a compound.  The phonosemantics of &#8220;war&#8221; are approprate to the meaning &#8212; a strong, grounded will generating huge energy, with no specified directed result (compare &#8220;work&#8221;, where the will-induced energy is directed into a container &#8220;k&#8221;).</p>
<p>As for &#8220;ship&#8221;, the history and phonosemantics are complex enough to deserve its own entry&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
