<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Defining Paganism II:  Foundations of Word Meaning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://druidjournal.net/2010/05/03/defining-paganism-ii-foundations-of-word-meaning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://druidjournal.net/2010/05/03/defining-paganism-ii-foundations-of-word-meaning/</link>
	<description>Spiritual Guidance by Word, Card, and Star</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 07:51:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Defining Paganism IV: Is Paganism a Religion? &#171; Druid Journal</title>
		<link>http://druidjournal.net/2010/05/03/defining-paganism-ii-foundations-of-word-meaning/comment-page-1/#comment-200032</link>
		<dc:creator>Defining Paganism IV: Is Paganism a Religion? &#171; Druid Journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 15:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://druidjournal.net/?p=1432#comment-200032</guid>
		<description>[...] the last few posts, I proposed a definition of pagan based on the notion of prototypes. In this definition, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the last few posts, I proposed a definition of pagan based on the notion of prototypes. In this definition, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Lilly</title>
		<link>http://druidjournal.net/2010/05/03/defining-paganism-ii-foundations-of-word-meaning/comment-page-1/#comment-200013</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Lilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 14:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://druidjournal.net/?p=1432#comment-200013</guid>
		<description>Argenta, I think you&#039;re right -- I was misusing &#039;archetype&#039;.  After a little more research, I think the correct linguistic term is &#039;prototype&#039;.  I&#039;m going to make edits in the post and fix it up.  It&#039;s sad to have to change the title, but so it goes.  :-)  Thanks for pointing it out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Argenta, I think you&#8217;re right &#8212; I was misusing &#8216;archetype&#8217;.  After a little more research, I think the correct linguistic term is &#8216;prototype&#8217;.  I&#8217;m going to make edits in the post and fix it up.  It&#8217;s sad to have to change the title, but so it goes.  <img src='http://druidjournal.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />   Thanks for pointing it out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Argenta</title>
		<link>http://druidjournal.net/2010/05/03/defining-paganism-ii-foundations-of-word-meaning/comment-page-1/#comment-199771</link>
		<dc:creator>Argenta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 03:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://druidjournal.net/?p=1432#comment-199771</guid>
		<description>&quot;Well, think of house. What comes to mind? I’m guessing it’s a single-family home, free-standing, with one or two stories and maybe a garage and some windows and a lawn. Obviously not all houses are like that, but when you think house, that’s the image that comes to mind. It’s a stereotypical house — or, to use a somewhat prettier term, an archetypal house.&quot;

Dear Jeff,
something&#039;s been bothering me for a while about this paragraph, but only today did I remember what! What you are describing here is not an archetypal house (no matter how pretty the term), which would be more universal and world-spread, but a culture-specific GENERIC house. An archetypal house would be,for example, the House of Death or lunar houses - that type of house which is shared in time and space through many cultures. A generic house is simply the best example of the word for a given community, in this example, a North American one. Where I come from, a generic house is a bit different, and usually does not have a lawn but a flower garden, and sometimes a vegetable garden or an orchard in the back.

Hope it wasn&#039;t too preposterous of me to point out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Well, think of house. What comes to mind? I’m guessing it’s a single-family home, free-standing, with one or two stories and maybe a garage and some windows and a lawn. Obviously not all houses are like that, but when you think house, that’s the image that comes to mind. It’s a stereotypical house — or, to use a somewhat prettier term, an archetypal house.&#8221;</p>
<p>Dear Jeff,<br />
something&#8217;s been bothering me for a while about this paragraph, but only today did I remember what! What you are describing here is not an archetypal house (no matter how pretty the term), which would be more universal and world-spread, but a culture-specific GENERIC house. An archetypal house would be,for example, the House of Death or lunar houses &#8211; that type of house which is shared in time and space through many cultures. A generic house is simply the best example of the word for a given community, in this example, a North American one. Where I come from, a generic house is a bit different, and usually does not have a lawn but a flower garden, and sometimes a vegetable garden or an orchard in the back.</p>
<p>Hope it wasn&#8217;t too preposterous of me to point out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

